Combinatorial Game Theory
who wins, and by how much
Concept

Translation — where it appears

Adding a fixed game to a whole population and asking what moves. A number shifts both stops by itself and decides everything it can decide; an infinitesimal shifts no stop at all and changes the outcome anyway.

Named by 8 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Seven infinitesimals, added to a whole day. Each row adds one infinitesimal to every value born by day three. The stops never move — that is what being smaller than every number means — the temperature moves a handful of times, and the outcome class moves in a quarter of the additions.

What an infinitesimal does to a fight

Adding a number moves both stops by exactly itself. Adding something smaller than every number moves neither — across 10,318 additions to a whole day of values, not once — and the outcome class changes anyway, 2,622 times. It changes at exactly one kind of position: the ones with a stop sitting on zero, which is where the numbers have run out of things to say.

sums · Translation Which end of the interval is open. Every value born by day 3 compared with each of its own two stops — 2,948 comparisons, each one a search over the difference. The two rows are mirror images because the day is closed under negation, and the small number in each row is the exception class: the 352 values whose two stops coincide, for which the left stop is the right stop and the law has nothing to bite on.

Which end of the interval is open

The confusion interval is open at both ends, and the two ends are not the same kind of open. At its own left stop a position can be below the number, confused with it or equal to it, and — over 2,948 comparisons — above it exactly thirty-three times, every one of them a value whose two stops are the same number and whose left end is therefore also its right one.

values · Stops How hot a background has to be. Every pair of values born by day two that share a reduced canonical form, added to backgrounds of seven temperatures and three means — 609 comparisons in all — with the count of pairs whose outcome the swap changes. Safety is not monotone in the background's temperature, so the threshold the question asks for does not exist; every one of the 48 changes is at a position with a stop exactly on nought.

How hot a background has to be

The reduced canonical form throws away infinitesimals, and the rung below asked for a bound: how hot must the rest of the board be for the discarded part not to matter? There is no such bound. Safety is not monotone in the background's temperature — an eighth is safe, a quarter is not, two is safe again — and the quantity that does decide it is not a temperature but a stop.

sums · Reduced form The stops stop working. Adding a switch to each of 120 day-three values, and asking whether the two stops of the sum are the sums of the two stops. They are on 330 of 720.

What a fight does to a fight

A number added to a position shifts both its stops by itself; an infinitesimal moves neither. A hot game does neither: over 720 sums the two stops add on 330 and are wrong on the rest. What survives is the mean, which adds on every one of the 720 — and the failure has a bound, since no stop is ever out by more than twice the smaller of the two temperatures, a bound 222 of the sums attain exactly.

sums · Translation The bound that needed no third number. The rung below's bound and the conjectured replacement, scored over 1,440 sums whose addend has a follow-up. The two-number bound holds everywhere and is attained; the three-number one fails.

A bound with one number too many

The rung below bounded how far a hot addend can drag a stop — twice the smaller of the two temperatures — over sums whose addends were all plain switches, and conjectured that an addend with a follow-up would need twice the smaller of three numbers. Over 1,440 sums with bent addends the two-number bound holds everywhere and is attained 358 times, and the three-number version fails on 66.

sums · Translation One quantity, two currencies. Each bent value with how far its temperature falls short of its stop reading and how far its stop falls short of the translation bound. The second is exactly twice the first.

The same number in two currencies

The rung below found bent-walled values falling strictly inside the translation bound and asked how far. The shortfall is the value's own hottest follow-up's temperature — exactly, on 400 of 408 pairs, and twice it on the other eight — which makes the whole error one expression. And it is the switches ladder's constant: a half there and a whole here, because a temperature is half a stop gap.

sums · Translation The census, closed. The three classes of the translation census with the expression each obeys, scored over all 1,440 pairs.

Where the value stops mattering

Fourteen straight-walled pairs missed the bound on a translated stop and had only a threshold to explain them. Their stops move by exactly the addend's temperature — a formula with the value nowhere in it — which turns the threshold into the boundary between two lines and closes a census of 1,440 pairs that has been open for four rungs.

sums · Translation The bound survives and the rule does not. The census against the widened sweep, with the bound and the two-line rule scored separately on each.

One expression proved, and one withdrawn

The census closed with three expressions exact on 1,440 pairs, and the rung above asked for derivations. The cold one has a four-line proof. The straight one has a threshold the census cannot determine — any constant between 4/3 and 3/2 fits it — and eight more addends of the same family break it on 38 pairs while leaving the bound above it untouched.

sums · Translation

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

StopsTemperatureDisjunctive sumEnumerationThermographDay threeInfinitesimalSwitchBoundExhaustive searchInvariantMean value

All concepts