Territory — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
When a real board falls apart
Amazons is played competitively, and late in a game the arrows have cut the board into regions no piece can cross. From that moment the position is a disjunctive sum — arrived at by the play rather than assumed — and the territory count every program uses can be measured against what the sum is actually worth.
A region one player owns
On a strip, a region containing only one player's amazons is worth exactly its free-square count, on all 45,057 positions of the rung below's sweep — and it predicted the exactness would fail in two dimensions, where an amazon can be short of room in one direction and not another. It does not fail. Over 2,412 two-dimensional regions there is no exception, and the reason is one clause: an amazon may shoot back at the square it has just left.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
AmazonsComponentDecompositionPartizanCounterexampleDisjunctive sumEnumerationExhaustive searchHeuristicIntegerInvariantNumber